https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939 --- Comment #3 from Alain V. <alain.vigne.14@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #2) Hi Petr, thank you for your interest in this lib, which is a follow-up work of our previous thoughts on librnd... > Why is this package called libfungw, when upstream repository and page > refers to it only as fungw? Does that conflict with existing fedora package? The 2 names are present in this proposal. There is a meta package called fungw (the %{srcname}) and libfungw. I know this complicates the .spec file, but it is a "request" from upstream dev. http://www.repo.hu/projects/fungw/packaging.txt See also the Debian page https://packages.debian.org/sid/libs/fungw > I think fungw is better name for the package. > > Why do you have %{name}-perl aliases and then use > > %package -n %{libperl} ?? > > %package perl > without -n produces just %{name}-perl by default. It is simpler, cleaner and > easier to read. Unless different prefix is required, use just suffixes for > subpackages. > There are multiple definitions not really required. > > Just use: > > %package perl > Requires: %{name}... > > %description perl > Blabla > > %files perl > %{_bindir}/whatever > I tend to agree with you... If I can manage to implement this, I'll keep your proposal. > It the application uses dlopen, I think it should have own subdirectory > %{_libdir}/%{name}, where it would store its own shared code/libraries. > %_libdir is reserved for libraries used by ld.so. You are correct. I need to add this line. I'll update this ticket with new .spec + SRPM as soon as I can. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
