https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939 Alain V. <alain.vigne.14@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Alain V. <alain.vigne.14@xxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint: libfungw.spec:214: W: configure-without-libdir-spec There is a comment in the .spec file. I consider this warning as OK. fedora-review: - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. The .so files in %_libdir are opened inside the application (not via the linker) using dlopen(). Upstream decided to store the files there, why not. But the main libfungw: /usr/lib64/libfungw.so is unversioned, and should be. This is already reported to upstream and might be corrected for next fungw version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2052939 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
