https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000219 --- Comment #4 from serge_sans_paille <sguelton@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Concerning the license, as all LLVM-related project we already ship, the LICENSE.txt actually contains two references: 1. the new license: Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions 2. the Legacy LLVM license : The libunwind library is dual licensed under both the University of Illinois "BSD-Like" license and the MIT license. I've updated the license text to reflect all three licenses. llvm-libunwind is a (partial) implementation of the unwind runtime library. It's generally the compiler (say gcc, or clang) that inserts call to it during the compilation process. That's why it doesn't ship headers. The tests are not shipped / run because they imply a build time dependency on the source code of libcxx and we don't package the source. I plan to rely on fedora gating to balance that issue. I've amended the specfile to reflect that libunwind is shipped into a subfolder of %_libdir instead of %_libdir to prevent it from conflicting with the default libunwind from https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libunwind I've added the required steps for building and installing doc. devel packaged added. The specfile and srpm url above now point to the updated specfile and source rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
