[Bug 2000219] Review Request: llvm-libunwind - LLVM libunwind implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000219



--- Comment #5 from Dan Čermák <dan.cermak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for the improvements! A few additional suggestions:

- You should own the directory %_libdir/llvm-unwind
- The devel package *must* require the main package as follows:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
(then you can also drop the %license in the devel package)
- the BuildArch: noarch is wrong, you cannot build only the documentation
anyway and the rest is arch specific
- remove the file html/.buildinfo, it is not required in the rpm
- there is no changelog (I would recommend to use rpmautospec)
- please link the patch to a upstream pull request or add a note in the spec
why it is not upstreamable
- you can save yourself the manual copying of the documentation and just put a
%doc libunwind/html into the %files doc section


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux