[Bug 1988151] Review Request: atomic-queue - C++ lockless queue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988151



--- Comment #6 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #4)
> Your suggestions are probably correct, but since this package is
> MIT-licensed, I can’t use anything copied from the GPL-licensed Linux
> kernel, and I don’t know either missing architecture well enough to craft
> something I am confident in from first principles.

Fair enough.  If the missing architectures ever become burdensome, though,
simply supplying an empty spin_loop_pause() function should be correct,
although you may be able to cook dinner on your CPU if you actually run the
code. :-)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux