https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for spotting this issue. I've fixed locally. The packaging guideline enforces the name of the source package to be the same as the archive name. But it's possible for a library only binary package to use lib prefix (and libfoo-devel for the related -devel package). rpm -qi librttr will give you hint about which source package this librtt binary package was created from. I've found curl package that already follow this convention. (using libcurl and libcurl-devel). So I don't think this break assumption. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
