https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616 Sergio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Sergio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #4) > But it's possible for a library only binary > package to use lib prefix (and libfoo-devel for the related -devel package). it is possible but is the Debian convention , not the "RedHat" or Fedora convention , and I prefer the RedHat / fedora one . > rpm -qi librttr will give you hint about which source package this librtt > binary package was created from. IMHO , is just less intuitive . > I've found curl package that already follow this convention. (using libcurl > and libcurl-devel). So I don't think this break assumption. Looking for curl.spec I see many things that would change . Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
