https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540335 --- Comment #14 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Ok, made mistake with offered Provides in 2): Correct version would be: Provides: lib%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Just a question, it has also working GUI with a different license (GPLv3). Is there some reason why gui variant is not packaged? Subpackage with gui variant would not hurt I think, would you need help with that? License tag is correct for command line version, gui subpackage would require License: BSD and GPLv3+ I checked it is not packaged also on Debian [2]. Compiled just fine to me, some Qt dependencies would be required, should not be difficult. Not mandatory for review, would be nice to have it. 2. https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/primesieve -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
