https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805 --- Comment #3 from Georg Sauthoff <fedora@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > - License is MIT and BSD: > https://github.com/mvantellingen/python-zeep/blob/master/LICENSE Hm, I thought that it's fine if we consider MIT as the effective license of this package. See also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#Multiple_licensing_situations And especially the first example in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#How_should_I_handle_multiple_licensing_situations.3F This view is also support by the Pypi license tag that the package authors used (i.e. just MIT): https://pypi.org/project/zeep/ https://github.com/mvantellingen/python-zeep/blob/8a1c71d795f880761daeeecfd39325c41d0a834a/setup.py#L85 OTOH, MIT is actually less strict than BSD 3 clause. Thus, I've changed the .spec license tag to 'MIT and BSD': Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/gsauthof/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00876550-python-zeep/python-zeep.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/gsauthof/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00876550-python-zeep/python-zeep-3.3.1-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
