Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-29 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > > * Please check which package owns %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ > > (currently no package) > > hm...%{_libdir}/%{name} is owned by current main package Yes > that imply its > subdirectory which's shipped & provided by main package to be owned > to same one. It may be that I don't understand correctly what you want to say, however if you write "%dir foo/", the subdirectories of foo/ are not _automatically_ owned by any subpackages. > > * I don't know what software calls g-wrap modules, however usually > > modules are dlopen'ed with the name '*.so', not '*.so.X'. > > So I guess libgw-guile-*.so under %{_libdir}/%{name}/modules/ > > should be in main package, not in -devel subpackage. > > do you also check this: > $ file libgw-guile-*.so > libgw-guile-gw-glib.so: symbolic link to `libgw-guile-gw-glib.so.0.0.0' > libgw-guile-standard.so: symbolic link to `libgw-guile-standard.so.0.0.0' Symlinks themselves are no problem, the problem is how these modules are dlopened (with what name). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review