Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-08-29 03:55 EST ------- Here is the review: + rpmlint output: W: cjkunifonts-ukai symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/cjkunifonts-ukai /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-ukai W: cjkunifonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-ukai obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW W: cjkunifonts-uming symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/cjkunifonts-uming /usr/share/fonts/cjkunifonts-uming W: cjkunifonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_CN W: cjkunifonts-uming obsolete-not-provided ttfonts-zh_TW IMO these can be waived. + package name follows upstream project name + spec filename matches package name + packages two Chinese truetype fonts currently part of fonts-chinese + Arphic Public License is listed on Licensing page + license with translations included + spec files is legible + source files agree with debian upstream: 465b1350911f086a2021c36e039f79c8 ttf-arphic-ukai_0.1.20060928.orig.tar.gz 4f2e5a4ba4cf3ac01518ea211a89fdc1 ttf-arphic-uming_0.1.20060928.orig.tar.gz + package is noarch and builds correctly + build deps listed + owns own dirs + filelist looks correct + consistent macro usage Need attention: - should not own ghostscript/conf.d/ which belongs to ghostscript - /usr/share/fonts/zh_*/TrueType/ seem to be empty in the rpm's - and already mentioned ghostscript conf paths -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review