[Bug 1519607] Review Request: gap-pkg-nautytracesinterface - GAP interface to nauty and Traces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519607



--- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Thank you for the review, Luya.

(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #1)
> Finally found the time for the review.

No worries.  December got super busy for me, too, as evidenced by the fact that
I am only now getting back to Fedora issues...

> Additionally, replace %setup -q -n %{user}-NautyTracesInterface-%{shorttag}
> by
> %autosetup -p1 -n %{user}-NautyTracesInterface-%{shorttag}

Done.

> Issues:
> =======
> - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
>   are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
>   Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
>   See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2

I wish somebody would fix that.  Rpmlint is wrong about this.  Try following
that URL. :-)  The BR is required:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:C_and_C%2B%2B

> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
>      found: "Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v2)".
> Could you check with upstream about the licensing from the following:
> Apache (v2.0)
> -------------
> sebasguts-NautyTracesInterface-5f16120/nauty26r7/COPYRIGHT
> 
> GPL (v2)
> --------
> sebasguts-NautyTracesInterface-5f16120/COPYING
> 
> Main reason is the compatibility between Apache 2.0 and GPLv2 as highlighted
> by
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses

The nauty distribution is packaged separately in Fedora, and this is in %prep:

# Make sure the bundled nauty is not used
rm -fr src/nauty*

Plus, the lone patch in this package removes dependencies on the bundled
version of nauty in favor of dependencies on the system version.  So none of
the Apache-licensed code is in the binary package.

> [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
>      Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
>      attached diff).
>      See: (this test has no URL)

Oops.  Fixed.  In addition, the package identifies itself as version 0.2, not
0.1, when it loads, so I have corrected the version field.  New URLs:

Spec URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-nautytracesinterface/gap-pkg-nautytracesinterface.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-nautytracesinterface/gap-pkg-nautytracesinterface-0.2-1.20171120git5f16120.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux