Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-29 15:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > I suggest the following patch to adress two issues: > 1. we shouldn't ship static libraries Why not? Many people using arpack do so in static builds. But what needs to be done is to split of the static lib in arpack-static (when the package was submitted the guideline did not exist yet). > 2. there's a bug in eigenvalue calculation routine, see > http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/pipermail/freefempp/2006/000213.html for more details. Thanks! It does look a bit awkward that freefem++ ships a patch to two files as those two files in a tarball within its tarball, and for simplicity's sake I'll better make a real patch out of it. Do you perhaps know whether freefem++ reported this bug upstream to arpack? I saw that you asked, but there was no reply on the archive (maybe unlinked due to mailman's archive boundaries). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review