[Bug 245431] Review Request: libtommath - portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libtommath -  portable number theoretic multiple-precision integer library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245431


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-06-29 15:53 EST -------
Sorry for all the nitpicking; here's a full review:

You usually shouldn't include the package name in the summary.

It's a bit odd to see the buildrequires split like that, but it's not a real issue.

Generally we like to see any available test suites run run if at all possible. 
The "test" and "mtest" makefile targets exist but I have no idea if they're
useful at all for testing.

I don't see that any of these are blockers.

APPROVED

Review:
* source files match upstream:
   8e397fc42a12f520ea50c29e477a8768a6f974af2470636f6f807141c13a240c  
   ltm-0.41.tar.bz2
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
? summary starts with the package name.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text (grant to public domain) included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  libtommath-0.41-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
   libtommath.so.0()(64bit)
   libtommath = 0.41-4.fc8
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
   libtommath.so.0()(64bit)

  libtommath-devel-0.41-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
   libtommath-devel = 0.41-4.fc8
  =
   libtommath = 0.41-4.fc8
   libtommath.so.0()(64bit)
* %check is not present.  There are some test-related things in the tarball (the 
   "test" and "mtest" makefile targets) but I have no idea how to run them.
* shared libraries present; ldconfig called as necessary and unversioned .so 
   files are in the -devel subpackage.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (ldconfig)
* code, not content.
* documentation is all in the -devel subpackage.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel subpackage.
* no pkgconfig files (unfortunately; it would make the move of the include files 
   easier)
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]