Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-29 15:43 EST ------- Is that perhaps comment #38? > It looks like the comments from Michał Bentkowski indicate that lapack/atlas are > sharing (virtual?) Provides, but are not compatible. See also comment #13. > > If atlas-devel/lapack-devel are interchangable forget my comment :) E.g. did your build fail because atlas was pulled in instead of lapack? In that case it's an issue within lapack <-> atlas that should be fixed irrespective of arpack. But even then I wonder why the build doesn't find %{_libdir}/liblapack.so when it's an explicit build requirement, even if pulled in from atlas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review