https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4) > nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib64/libobjc.la > nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib64/libsupc++.la > nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib64/libstdc++.la > nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib32/libstdc++.la > nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib32/libobjc.la > nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib32/libsupc++.la > OK too. There's a rule against .la files, but a compiler is special. Putting aside the fact that I do not see any sense in shipping these *.la's, the rpmlint warning typically means that these files carry bogus permissions (Likely these are marked "executable" while they should not be). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review