https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301116 --- Comment #19 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michel Normand from comment #16) > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #15) > > additional comments: > > - please update release for each iteration, it hard to track the changes > > made if it's kept the same and spec and srpms are overridden > > I will do for next > > > - you can drop also the "build" dir for man pages, it's a no-op at the end > > mkdir -p build/man3 > > cp man3/*.3 build/man3 > > There are other files in man3/ I do not want to package > this is the reason why i did a copy before to install build/man3/ > > > - I would use only VERS_LIB=%{version} otherwise it appends also ".1.fc24" > > which is not correct IMO > > I will do > > > - the libcxl.so symlink need to be created manually or the makefile be > > updated to create it, then "%files" should have > > %{_libdir}/libcxl.so.* > > and "%files devel" then > > %{_libdir}/libcxl.so > > I am lost :( for me the symbolic link is created by ldconfig at install time > from the soname information present in the shipped so file > === > $ls -ltr /usr/lib64/libcxl.so* > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 69216 mars 3 16:59 /usr/lib64/libcxl.so.1.3 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 13 mars 3 17:00 /usr/lib64/libcxl.so.1 -> > libcxl.so.1.3 there are usually 3 files for a library - first the versioned real file - /usr/lib64/libcxl.so.1.3 - second the symlink with soname (can be created by ldconfig) - /usr/lib64/libcxl.so.1 - and last the development symlink libfoo.so that is used by a linker when linking an app with the foo library The first 2 files go to the main package (via %{_libdir}/libfoo.so.*), the last one to the devel subpackage (via %{_libdir}/libfoo.so). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review