https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876 Christian Dersch <lupinix@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Christian Dersch <lupinix@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Package looks fine now => APPROVED! Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 350 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/review/1281876-enki/licensecheck.txt ====> Whole package is GPLv2+ now as mentioned explicitly by upstream => fine [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in enki [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in enki [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in enki-doc ====> Not required for a -doc subpackage [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: enki-15.11.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm enki-plugins-15.11.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm enki-doc-15.11.0-1.fc24.noarch.rpm enki-15.11.0-1.fc24.src.rpm enki.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary enki enki-plugins.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- enki-plugins.noarch: W: no-documentation enki.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary enki 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Requires -------- enki-plugins (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): enki python(abi) enki-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): enki (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /usr/bin/python2 PyQt4 ctags hicolor-icon-theme pyparsing python(abi) python-docutils python-markdown python-regex python2 python2-qutepart Provides -------- enki-plugins: enki-plugins enki-doc: enki-doc enki: application() application(enki.desktop) enki mimehandler(text/css) mimehandler(text/html) mimehandler(text/plain) mimehandler(text/x-adasrc) mimehandler(text/x-c++src) mimehandler(text/x-chdr) mimehandler(text/x-cmake) mimehandler(text/x-csharp) mimehandler(text/x-csrc) mimehandler(text/x-fortran) mimehandler(text/x-idl) mimehandler(text/x-java) mimehandler(text/x-lua) mimehandler(text/x-makefile) mimehandler(text/x-pascal) mimehandler(text/x-patch) mimehandler(text/x-python) mimehandler(text/x-readme) mimehandler(text/x-tcl) mimehandler(text/x-tex) mimehandler(text/x-texinfo) mimehandler(text/x-verilog) mimehandler(text/x-vhdl) mimehandler(text/xml) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/hlamer/enki/archive/v15.11.0.tar.gz#/enki-15.11.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a4faab826a02e57fe92ee842e30c9eb2ec15be0aefc6e8d5ea9af1116eb00408 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a4faab826a02e57fe92ee842e30c9eb2ec15be0aefc6e8d5ea9af1116eb00408 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1281876 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review