Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422 ------- Additional Comments From gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-31 07:06 EST ------- OK. I've followed the guidelines and built new rpms. Please find the new rpms, spec file, and desktop file here: http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/FEDORA/mrxvt/0.5.2-1/ Also, here is the latest rpmlint: [a@laptop mrxvt_devel]$ sudo rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mrxvt-0.5.2-1.i386.rpm W: mrxvt incoherent-version-in-changelog 1 0.5.2-1 W: mrxvt wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mrxvt/scripts/mrxvt.vbs W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/mrxvtrc.sample W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/mrxvtrc W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/submenus.menu W: mrxvt non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mrxvt/default.menu I believe the changelog version warning is OK considering the sources are for 0.5.2 and we don't have a minor release number (Am I incorrect?). The end-of-line-encoding is because it's a visual basic script -- this should be fine b/c it shouldn't kill the build process, correct? The non-conffile errors...is that a big deal??? considering a user should know where to grab example configuration information? I know it doesn't conform to the LSB. Is there a precedent for including this? or should they be moved? If they need to be moved, can someone suggest a proper location? As always, thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review