https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226557 --- Comment #2 from nobrakal@xxxxxxxxx --- Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/amsynth.spec SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/amsynth-1.5.1-2.fc22.src.rpm Hi, First, thank you for your (great) help :) > What's the reason why these are not enabled? All is now enabled by default, I created an other subpackage for the dssi plugin. I added lash as a requirement. > %package lv2-plugin Now lv2-amsynth-plugins, I took examples on existent packages. I named the dssi package "amsynth-dssi" for the same reason: all packages that provide a dssi plugin are named like %{name}-dssi. > License: GPLv2 Sorry, you are right, the main.cc include "or later", now GPLv2+ > %doc COPYING AUTHORS README Now a good %license tag, I include in the license authors, I don't know if it's a good thing. > %{_datadir}/appdata/%{name}.metainfo.xml Fixed, with a right name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review