https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226557 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.micheal@xxxxxxx> --- Just a quick comment: > all packages that provide a dssi plugin are named like %{name}-dssi. Likely those packages predate the %parent-%child naming guidelines and have not been renamed. Technically, these plugins are based on the DSSI Plugin API -- they all install into %{_libdir}/dssi/ -- and therefore can be seen as add-ons to the "dssi" package. Like LADSPA, where all LADSPA based plugins begin with "ladspa-": $ dnf -q list \*ladspa |grep -v ^Avail|wc -l 1 $ dnf -q list ladspa\* |grep -v ^Avail|wc -l 17 There's also packages named dssi-calf-plugins : subpackage of "calf" -> review bug 492974 from 2009 dssi-vst dssi-vst-wine which follow the %parent-%child naming scheme. Yes, sometimes this is not easy, and packagers/reviewers have come up with what they found plausible during review. Possibly years ago. Reading up on DSSI, it is said at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposable_Soft_Synth_Interface that it is old and that LV2 is considered a successor that reunites DSSI and LADSPA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review