https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503 --- Comment #14 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- I had a deeper look at the licensing scenario, and hopefully I figured out what it really is. GPL is not applicable, it refers to xml2po.py, which is a helper script only. $ licensecheck -r * | grep BSD thirdparty/getopt/getopt_long.c: BSD (3 clause) thirdparty/getopt/getopt.c: BSD (3 clause) This refers to bundled stuff. We don't use this, we need to pull the getopt development files from the build system. This also means you still have to remove thirdparty/getopt, better the whole thirdparty directory to be on safer side. Maybe a patch is needed to use the local getopt instead of the bundled one. $ licensecheck -r * | grep ISC tests/DirectExecTest.cpp: ISC tests/UnicodeHandlingTest.cpp: ISC tests/C4ValueTest.cpp: ISC tests/C4StringTableTest.cpp: ISC The licensecheck script fails here to correctly detect the license of the source files. The file headers map the ISC license, so this would be OK. (In reply to MartinKG from comment #13) > i found this on wiki: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OpenClonk_Icon.png > that means CC-BY-NC-3.0 correct ? > See below (a "bad license"!). > and Clonk Source Code License (ISC) > http://www.clonk.de/source.php > See above. > and Clonk Game Content License > http://www.clonk.de/developer.php?lng=en > Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ > > which License tag should i use now ? As far as I can evaluate, the license tag has to be "ISC and CC-BY-NC". but have a look at the tables in the licensing guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses_3 The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License is mentioned there as a "bad license" (maybe due to inacceptable restrictions). So I'm afraid this package is only releasable in RPMfusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
