Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-10 13:32 EST ------- Sorry to interrupt. I have not read the previous discussion in detail, however my recognition is that the problem with this package is: * the package xu4 _itself_ has no license problem * to use xu4 actually, xu4 needs some data and one (who uses xu4) has to download the data from some URL * And the license of the data is in question Okay? If so, this is exactly the case of "xtide" package which I maintain and was reviewed by Patrice Dumas. If my recognition is correct, please check the comment by Patrice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626#c32 and what we actually did in /usr/share/doc/xtide-common-2.9.3/README.fedora (in xtide-common rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review