Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-05-10 13:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Sorry to interrupt. I have not read the previous discussion > in detail, however my recognition is that the problem with > this package is: > > * the package xu4 _itself_ has no license problem > * to use xu4 actually, xu4 needs some data and one (who > uses xu4) has to download the data from some URL > * And the license of the data is in question > Correct, except that the license is not in question, it can be freely and legally downloaded, but may not be (re)distributed. > Okay? > If so, this is exactly the case of "xtide" package which > I maintain and was reviewed by Patrice Dumas. > If my recognition is correct, please check the comment by Patrice > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626#c32 > and what we actually did in > /usr/share/doc/xtide-common-2.9.3/README.fedora (in xtide-common > rpm). Correct, this is the same. Except I created a python gtk gui app todo the downloading, which will explain to the user that a download is necessary, why and asks his permission todo the actual download. You may want to check this package out. The autodownloader app used is configurable through a config file, so it may be of use (userfriendlier, works interactively even when launched from the menu) to the xtide case too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review