Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xu4 - Ultima IV recreated Alias: xu4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238367 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-05-10 13:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > You know, some time ago I would have objected to this package for precisely the > reason that Nigel did, but then the decision was made to include Codec Buddy, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCodecBuddy, which exists only to > download non-free (but zero cost) content in precisely the same manner that > autodownloader+xu4 does. So now I really don't know where the line should be > drawn. I suppose if you actually had to go out and buy something in order to > make xu4 useful then that would be unacceptable. Funny that you mention that, actually CodecBuddy is worse, and crosses a line which I would never cross with any use of autodownloader: 1) It downloads non-free code!, not content but code! 2) It only does that for mp3, for for example divx, it takes you to a place where you can buy non free codecs for this from fluendo. So to quote you: 'I suppose if you actually had to go out and buy something in order to make xu4 useful then that would be unacceptable' That actually happens with CodecBuddy! (AFAIK). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review