https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172414 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Well, * Documentation - At least please add COPYING as %license - Also, please consider to add some files to %doc, such as README. * Licensing issue - See above * Debuginfo issue - See above * rpmlint - Well, while I ignore "missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid" rpmlint issue (because these files are for testing such syscalls), now: * Lots of "non-standard-executable-perm 0775L" rpmlints - It should be okay with 0755 (as owner/group is root:root) * Some "script-without-shebang" rpmlints - As these does not have shebang (and at least some of files look like just a text file), these need not have executable permission (or is this intentional?) * Some "spurious-executable-perm" error on testcases/bin/*.c - While I am not sure if these *.c files are really needed (in the binary rpm), at least executable permissions should not be necessary. (note that also "devel-file-in-non-devel-package" rpmlint appears) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review