https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172414 Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Some notes: - Licensing Well, this package is a bit hard because the source tarball contains 8119 files, with 3 of them are .tar.gz which contains another 49 files. >From the point of view with regard to licensing check my first "grep"ing classified 6115 files, I had to check the rest ~2000 files with my eyes. While I may have overlooked something, one thing I detected: * APSL 1.1 - not sure for 1.1, however APSL 2.0 is marked as incompatible with GPL testcases/kernel/fs/fsx-linux/fsx-linux.c - Debuginfo issue I think using %undefine _missing_build_ids_terminate_build is better than removing executable permission from .obj files (not linked, missing build-id). Full review follows. By the way, I would appreciate it if you would review my review request (bug 1171991) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review