https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134840 --- Comment #4 from Juan Orti Alcaine <juan.orti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3) > python3 is packaged with a Python license so I think we can consider same > License tag to this package, too. It already has the License tag as Python > You can include temporarily a separated License file waiting for upstream. Is that really necessary? I'm reading the license and can't find where it says that the full text of the license must be shipped with the program. This is the relevant part of the guidelines, third paragraph: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text License: https://docs.python.org/3.4/license.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review