https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134840 Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) | --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Also, Fedora Packaging Guidelines refers to a Python2 license > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses). Can we handle > Python3 at same way? python3 is packaged with a Python license so I think we can consider same License tag to this package, too. > I've asked the author about fixing the license link and including a copy of > it. Anyway You can include temporarily a separated License file waiting for upstream. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review