https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134840 --- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Juan Orti Alcaine from comment #4) > Is that really necessary? I'm reading the license and can't find where it > says that the full text of the license must be shipped with the program. > > This is the relevant part of the guidelines, third paragraph: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the indicated license requires that the full license text be included, Fedora Packagers must either: * Include a copy of what they believe the license text is intended to be, as part of the Fedora package in %doc, in order to remain in compliance. It is worth noting that this may place some additional risk on the packager, however, Fedora believes that this risk is minimized by the fact that if the upstream disagrees with what we have distributed as the full license text, they can easily remedy this by making full license text available in the source code. Packagers who choose to do this should ensure that they have exhausted all attempts to work with upstream to include the license text as part of the source code, or at least, to confirm the full license text explicitly with the upstream, as this minimizes the risk on the packager. Packagers should also take copies of license texts from reliable and canonical sources (such as the Fedora Software Licenses page, the FSF licenses page, or the OSI license list), whenever possible. * Choose not to package that software for Fedora. Anyway, it does not seem so complicated to me include a simple text file as %doc. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review