[Bug 225892] Merge Review: hwbrowser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: hwbrowser


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225892





------- Additional Comments From nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-24 09:07 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> build.log showed me
> + desktop-file-install --vendor redhat --delete-original --dir
> /var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications
>
/var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/hwbrowser.desktop
>
/var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/redhat-hwbrowser.desktop:
> warning: boolean key "Terminal" has value "0", boolean values should be "false"
> or "true", although "0" and "1" are allowed in this field for backwards
> compatibility

fixed

>
/var/tmp/hwbrowser-0.31-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/redhat-hwbrowser.desktop:
> warning: The 'Application' category is not defined by the desktop entry
> specification.  Please use one of "AudioVideo", "Audio", "Video", "Development",
> "Education", "Game", "Graphics", "Network", "Office", "Settings", "System",
> "Utility" instead

fixed

> 
> ALSO
> rpmlint reported on SRPM
> W: hwbrowser macro-in-%changelog _datadir
> Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead
> to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that
> affect the build.  Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in
> possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally
> odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted.  Avoid use of macros
> in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'.
> 

fixed

> And on RPM
> W: hwbrowser incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.31 0.31-1.fc7
> The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not
> coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package.

this will stay, as we're upstream for hwbrowser, thus releases will almost
always be "1{?dist}"

> 
> E: hwbrowser non-executable-script /usr/share/hwbrowser/DeviceList.py 0644
> This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for
> executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed.  If
> the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits,
> otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere.

fixed

> 
> Kindly correct those things and update the package.

hwbrowser-0.32 is building right now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]