[Bug 1064995] Review Request: perl-File-Slurp-Tiny - A simple, sane and efficient file slurper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995

Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #3)
> > - %build section should likely use %{__perl} instead of perl
> 
> The guidelines generally discourage the use of macros for commands except
> where there's a need for the command path to be configurable, and cites
> %{__python} as an example. In Fedora there have been parallel python2 and
> python3 stacks so that might seem a reasonable example but Fedora has never
> shipped more than one version of perl and so there's not really a need for
> configurability here. So I prefer the tidier, shorter version.
I have always been in favor of "%perl" and consider package which are using
perl to be sloppily maintainedd, because it
a) is an absolute path, which avoids picking up an arbitrary "perl" in $PATH,
and thus improves deterministic builds
b) the possibility for fedora to ship another perl >> 0 (Perl6, Scls).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]