https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jedelsky <jakub.jedelsky@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for first review Christopher. I know about python 3 support and want to add it, but I'm not sure with naming and file handling. Naming: This package isn't just a python module but a utility/program, so it looks weird to named it python-asciinema to me. Maybe we can named it asciinema and ( python3-asciinema or asciinema-python3 ) ? File handling: I tried to add python3 support, but there is problem with /usr/bin/asciinema file - the main script file - which should be included in both (python and python3) rpms. So one should install just one of them or .. i'm not sure how to solve this. 2., 3. and 4. are included in this pre-python3 version of SPEC: https://gist.github.com/jakubjedelsky/7654715 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review