[Bug 1034492] Review Request: asciinema - Record and upload terminal sessions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034492

Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I came up with a thought, as far as I can know, Fedora will move to python3
stack soon after 2~3 releases, so I think we just need to have one package
"asciinema" built upon python2, when Fedora moves to python3, we rebuild itupon
python3.

The reason of not keeping python3-asciinema is that I think this is a very
weird and unwise naming way. Users just want to install asciinema itself and
want to use it as soon as possible, they don't need to care about whether it's
built upon py2 or py3, so I think we don't need to waste space in the repo ;)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]