https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 --- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- Still one more issue, though. %dir %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/lib%{name} %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/lib%{name}/* In this case the whole folder path /usr/share/gtk-doc/html would stay unowned. No problem, you could simply add "Requires: gtk-doc" and all is fine. That package is quite small and doesn't eat up a lot of disk space. But it has a disadvantage, it pulls a lot of dependencies, and gtk-doc is actually not needed for libtubo at runtime. In such cases, it is allowed and usual to co-own the whole folder %{_datadir}/gtk-doc and don't require gtk-doc at all. I can't find the appropriate guideline for the time being, just have a look at the first entry of the associated tracking bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169#c0 And last but not least, a wrong comment has crept in your spec: ## Remove static libs find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -delete The same as in your librfm review ticket, you know what to do ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review