https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 --- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Fixed. > The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or > misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, > possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. https://sourceforge.net/p/xffm/support-requests/2/ > In such cases, it is allowed and usual to co-own the whole folder % > {_datadir}/gtk-doc and don't require gtk-doc at all. I can't find the > appropriate guideline for the time being, just have a look at the first entry > of the associated tracking bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169#c0 Something like that is debated is the Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function In this way it should be okay: Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libtubo/tubo.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libtubo/tubo-5.0.7-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review