https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016807 Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- Scratch build for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6059678 $ rpmlint -i -v * tubo.src: I: checking tubo.src: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo.src: W: strange-permission tubo-5.0.7.tar.gz 0600L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. tubo.src: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/xffm/files/libtubo/tubo-5.0.7.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) tubo.armv7hl: I: checking tubo.armv7hl: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo.i686: I: checking tubo.i686: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo.x86_64: I: checking tubo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo-debuginfo.armv7hl: I: checking tubo-debuginfo.armv7hl: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo-debuginfo.armv7hl: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tubo-5.0.7/src/tubo_static.i The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-debuginfo.armv7hl: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tubo-5.0.7/src/tubo.c The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-debuginfo.i686: I: checking tubo-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tubo-5.0.7/src/tubo_static.i The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tubo-5.0.7/src/tubo.c The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking tubo-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tubo-5.0.7/src/tubo_static.i The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tubo-5.0.7/src/tubo.c The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-devel.armv7hl: I: checking tubo-devel.armv7hl: W: summary-not-capitalized C tubo headers and development-related files Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. tubo-devel.armv7hl: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo-devel.armv7hl: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. tubo-devel.armv7hl: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/tubo.h The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-devel.i686: I: checking tubo-devel.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized C tubo headers and development-related files Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. tubo-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo-devel.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. tubo-devel.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/tubo.h The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo-devel.x86_64: I: checking tubo-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C tubo headers and development-related files Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. tubo-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://xffm.org/libtubo.html (timeout 10 seconds) tubo-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. tubo-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/tubo.h The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. tubo.spec: I: checking-url http://sourceforge.net/projects/xffm/files/libtubo/tubo-5.0.7.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 7 warnings. The old FSF addresses have to be reported upstream. To make rpmlint happy regarding the not-capitalized summary, you might use the following template, which you get anyway when creating a new spec with rpmdev-newspec: Summary: Development files for %{name} ... %description devel The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing applications that use %{name}. It isnot really dangerous to let the tarball have the mentioned permissions, but you could change it to 0644 as proposed before creating the srpm. (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #1) > Building is silent. It's impossible to check whether the compiler is invoked > correctly from log-files. After adding this rule and building the library on Koji, I can't see any peculiarities. Ralf, please have a look at build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9680/6059680/build.log If you don't have any further objections, I would complete this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review