https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350 Daniel E. Wilson <danw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(danw@xxxxxxxxxxxx | |g) | --- Comment #37 from Daniel E. Wilson <danw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Updated spec file for version 5.3.6 of racket. I moved the static libraries back into the racket-devel package. No doubt someone will complain about this but the upstream developer documentation makes it clear that these files are necessary for developing extensions for the racket interpreter. The racket documentation is huge and so it was easy to overlook, thanks Jan for the link. Jan is correct about the reason for the explicit dependences. The link for the source RPM file is: http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~danw/racket-5.2.1-1.fc16.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N4LZTphOEi&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review