https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986175 Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #1) > [!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file > Note: Found : Packager: Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> That's my local .rpmmacros. > [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file > from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. Fixed in spec file; has it been reported upstream? > [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > jackson-module-jaxb-annotations.noarch: W: self-obsoletion > jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations <= 2.2.2 obsoletes > jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations = 2.2.2 Can you fix this? Spec file should read: Obsoletes: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations < %{version} Provides: jackson2-module-jaxb-annotations = %{version} As per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages Please fix it before importing. What is line 15 of the spec file? A leftover? #BuildRequires: glassfish-jaxb-api If that's some note (like "new version should require this") please add an explanation. Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1NXuB1Fmf9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review