https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986170 gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #2) > (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #1) > > [!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file > > Note: Found : Packager: Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> > > That's my local .rpmmacros. > > > [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > > file > > from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > > [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > > Fixed in spec file; has it been reported upstream? > yes @ https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/88 > > [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > > Provides are present. > > jackson-core.noarch: W: self-obsoletion jackson2-core <= 2.2.2 obsoletes > > jackson2-core = 2.2.2 > > Can you fix this? Spec file should read: > > Obsoletes: jackson2-core < %{version} > Provides: jackson2-core = %{version} done > > As per: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming. > 2FReplacing_Existing_Packages > > Please fix it before importing. Package approved. Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-core.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-core-2.2.2-2.fc19.src.rpm New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: jackson-core Short Description: Core part of Jackson Owners: gil Branches: f19 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bIr2e9ggpI&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review