[Bug 229657] Review Request: iverilog - Icarus Verilg is a verilog compiler, simulator.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: iverilog - Icarus Verilg is a verilog compiler, simulator.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229657


wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-02-27 03:38 EST -------
here we go with the :SHOULD: part from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines. Conventions for below:
OK = it's OK as it is
MUSTFIX = there is a problem which needs fixing
NA = not available/ does not apply

 If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from
upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it - OK
 The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available - NA
 The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - OK, builds in mock
for devel/x86_64
- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures - OK, builds in mock for devel/x86_64 and i386 (no ppc to test on)
- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example - OK, works as
advertised
- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague,
and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. - NA
- SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package
using a fully versioned dependency. - OK
- SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and
this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A
reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed
in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. - NA


There are no blockers so the package is APPROVED. Cristi, unless someone spots
something that I have missed (I hope I did not...), you can proceed with CVS
request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]