Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611 --- Comment #16 from Till Bubeck <t.bubeck@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #15) > I think this package would have to be ported to RPM Fusion, as it's > completely non-functional without the core XBMC package, unless there's some > kind of precedent for having it in Fedora. I know that XBMC is part of rpmfusion and I am thankful for the work you do there. However, VDR is part of Fedora. "My" package is a plugin of VDR to offer an additional access to VDR named "VNSI". Any frontend (not only XBMC) could use that protocol to access VDR. You are right, that XBMC uses that protocol to access VDR. Please note, that this VDR plugin was named "VNSI" and not "XBMC" to express that it is not thought of a "XBMC only" access. At least, this is my understanding. So I see it as part of VDR simlar to the streamingserver plugin of VDR. I see the addons needed in XBMC to connect to a PVR belonging to XBMC and therefore belonging to RPM Fusion. So I see this package as part of Fedora. However, my primary interest is to get the users of Fedora (including rpmfusion) an easy access to VDR and XBMC. Therefore, I do not mind _that_ much, where it belongs. If no one is stepping up to review this package I am thankfully moving to rpmfusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=86USQDGvvg&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review