Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-12 12:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > In reply to comment #12: > >Also, you should be aware that FE-policy so far had been, headers can go to > >"/usr/include, if a package installs very few headers which are almost > >guaranteed never to conflict". > > Where is this guideline listed? I know of no such rule... It's not listed anywhere. It's simply common sense and established "good" practice by many FE packagers. > Perhaps you should get the package guidelines to include such a blocker rule? <sigh> Seems as if we need regulations for anything </sigh> Please note, that I only commented and expressed my opinion, I did not block this package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review