Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-12 13:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14): >> Where is this guideline listed? I know of no such rule... >It's not listed anywhere. It's simply common sense and established "good" >practice by many FE packagers. Right. >> Perhaps you should get the package guidelines to include such a blocker rule? ><sigh> Seems as if we need regulations for anything </sigh> For things that should block inclusion of a package, I think so... >Please note, that I only commented and expressed my opinion, I did not block >this package review. Sure, and like I said, I share much of your opinion on this... but I don't think it's a blocking issue for the package. Lets see what Thomas can find out from upstream. Hopefully they will quickly do the right thing and we will all be happy. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review