Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redland https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195647 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-02-12 12:35 EST ------- In reply to comment #12: I understand your strong feelings in this, and share many of them, however... >Also, you should be aware that FE-policy so far had been, headers can go to >"/usr/include, if a package installs very few headers which are almost >guaranteed never to conflict". Where is this guideline listed? I know of no such rule... Perhaps you should get the package guidelines to include such a blocker rule? Thomas: Can you mail upstream and ask if they will change this... for now, we can just move forward with the include files in /usr/include, and then hopefully they will update to use a /usr/include/<package> soon. If it looks like they will make this change soon, you can change it in your package and then drop the change when upstream moves to it? I'll leave this in REVIEW for a few days to let you talk to upstream and see if they will do this change, and when... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review