https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845805 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > - Is there any benefit of moving the various doc files in %install section? The > optimal solution, I think, is to leave them in %{gem_instdir} and mark them as > %doc there. It is good habbit on every other package but rubygems. Location is not mandated by guidelines. I already opened discussion about it on packaging mailing lists. > Also, please only leave files related to licensing (COPYING, GPLv2, GPLv3, > LICENSE) in the main package and move the others to the -doc subpackage. So you mean just copy README.rdoc, to -doc package? ok. > It is customary to exclude cached gem in the RPM packaged gems, please do so. done > %{gem_docdir} should be marked as %doc. done Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-ttfunk/rubygem-ttfunk.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-ttfunk/rubygem-ttfunk-1.0.3-3.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review