Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flex-old - Legacy version of flex, a tool for creating scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220381 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-02 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Another note... I realized flex can't have .so library, because binaries would > then be runtime-dependent on flex. You'd have to split the package into run-time/devel/static to get this working, but I do agree, this isn't very useful for flex-old/compat-flex. Let's stay with one package and static libs only in this particular case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review