Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-02-02 05:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > > > IMO, all but the sdc-prefixed ones are way too generic. Does this package > > > support --program-prefix? > > > > While I see your point here, I can see using --program-prefix potentially > > causing problems with dependent packages... > > > Would it be better to install everything under /usr/sdcc-i386, as suggested for > cross compilers? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/CrossCompilers No. This would conflict with GCC's conventions. But what would work is to install the apps somewhere outside of %{_bindir}, e.g /usr/lib/sdcc/bin or /usr/libexec/sdcc and to install symlinks or wrapper scripts named "sdcc-<app>" into %{_bindir} Other packages wanting to use the "non-prefixed" versions then could apply PATH=/usr/lib/scdc/bin:$PATH (or similar) to access the unprefixed versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review