[Bug 782560] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-shadow - *nix Shadow Password Module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560

Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tmz@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #3 from Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-14 08:46:44 EST ---
Wouldn't Obsoletes: ruby(shadow) < 1.4.1-16 be better?  1.4.1-15.fc18 was the
last version of the old package in Fedora and EPEL AFAICT.

Similarly, I think:

  Obsoletes:      ruby-shadow >= 1.4.1
  Provides:       ruby-shadow >= 1.4.1

should be more like:

  Obsoletes:      ruby-shadow < 1.4.1-16
  Provides:       ruby-shadow = %{version}-%{release}

Is the '*' in the summary going to make life interesting for folks searching
via yum?  Maybe 'Ruby shadow password module' is good?

(Just some comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks for packaging this Mike,
and thanks for the review Bohuslav. :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]