Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560 --- Comment #4 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-15 02:14:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Wouldn't Obsoletes: ruby(shadow) < 1.4.1-16 be better? 1.4.1-15.fc18 was the > last version of the old package in Fedora and EPEL AFAICT. > > Similarly, I think: > > Obsoletes: ruby-shadow >= 1.4.1 > Provides: ruby-shadow >= 1.4.1 > > should be more like: > > Obsoletes: ruby-shadow < 1.4.1-16 > Provides: ruby-shadow = %{version}-%{release} > Well, the guidelines for obsoleting are pretty clear, so it should really be the way I mentioned in comment2. > Is the '*' in the summary going to make life interesting for folks searching > via yum? Maybe 'Ruby shadow password module' is good? > That's probably a good point :) Michael, I think that you should fix this (but not a blocker on my side). > (Just some comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks for packaging this Mike, > and thanks for the review Bohuslav. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review